새로운 것은 언제나 발명품의 모습으로 오는 것이 아닙니다.
정해진 모양대로 만들지 않는 아이, 다른 방식으로 배우는 사람, 아직 이름 없는 직업, 익숙하지 않은 삶을 선택한 가족, 혹은 기존의 일하는 방식을 다시 보게 하는 도구일 수 있습니다.
우리는 그것이 무엇이 될 수 있는지 이해하기 전에 낯선 것을 위험이라 부르곤 합니다.선언 읽기
THE FAMILIAR FEELS SAFE
익숙한 것이 반드시 더 좋은 것은 아닙니다. 그저 예측하기 쉬울 뿐입니다.
We often confuse familiarity with safety.
SMALL ACTS OF DOING DIFFERENTLY
새로움은 때로 한 사람이 다른 방법을 선택하는 아주 작은 장면입니다.
A child building something unlike the model.
A person learning by doing instead of only reading.
Someone who does not want the management path.
A family redistributing care.
A team removing unnecessary meetings.
A person choosing time over maximum income.
모든 차이를 고칠 필요는 없습니다.
HOW WE LABEL WHAT WE DO NOT KNOW
The words we use for the new affect whether it is allowed to exist.
RiskyAn experiment
UnrealisticA possibility
UnstableA model taking shape
Not a real jobA profession without a name
No one has done itSomething worth exploring
Too differentAnother point of view
DIFFERENT DOES NOT MEAN WRONG
기존 방식과 다르다고 진지하지 않은 것은 아닙니다.
Another way to learn is still learning. A new path does not erase the value of the old one. A choice outside the majority is not automatically a step backward.
THE UNFINISHED IDEA
아이디어는 처음부터 확실하지 않아도 들을 가치가 있습니다.
A NEW WAY TO LEARN
A different way of learning is not proof that someone cannot learn.
There is more than one way to understand.
Trying and revising is learning.
Practice is not less valuable than theory.
A good question can matter more than a fast answer.
Not everyone needs the same pace.
One method of evaluation cannot define the whole learner.
A NEW WAY TO WORK
A new way of working threatens not only the old process, but also the sense of control that process created.
Meetings to prove workAsynchronous documentation
Presence to prove commitmentEvaluation by outcome
Instant replies to prove responsibilityUninterrupted focus
Management as the only pathParallel expert paths
Long reports for controlEnough information to decide
A NEW WAY TO LIVE
The familiar is often called natural, even when it is only what has been repeated the longest.
Living more slowly.
Not maximizing income.
Taking time to care for someone.
Not pursuing a higher title.
Leaving the city.
Putting health and time before speed of advancement.
AI IS TODAY'S EXAMPLE
오늘날 새로운 것에 대한 두려움에는 눈에 띄는 이름이 있습니다. AI입니다.
WHAT SHOULD TOOLS TAKE AWAY?
There are parts of work people should not have to keep carrying.
Re-entering data.
Repeated formatting.
First-pass summaries.
Basic information search.
Manual reporting.
Exhausting operations that require little judgment.
Automating a task does not mean the person who once performed it has lost their value.
WHAT SHOULD BE RETURNED TO HUMANS?
도구는 더 많이 하게 할 뿐 아니라 사람에게 시간을 돌려주어야 합니다.
Thought.
Judgment.
Learning.
Creativity.
Care.
Conversation.
Observation.
Rest.
Complex problem solving.
FASTER FOR WHAT?
속도는 사람이 돌려받은 시간을 어떻게 쓸지 결정할 수 있을 때 의미가 있습니다.
Faster for what?
Who receives the saved time?
Do workers get to rest?
Or do expectations simply rise?
Does work decrease, or is the space filled again?
How are the benefits of productivity shared?
CURIOSITY AND CAUTION
호기심과 신중함은 함께 존재할 수 있습니다.
Learn before concluding.
Experiment at a small scale.
Set clear limits.
Observe the impact.
Admit what is unknown.
Keep the right to question.
Do not worship the new.
Do not reject the new only from fear.
THE RISK OF REFUSING TO CHANGE
변하지 않는 것도 결정이며, 그것에도 위험이 있습니다.
A CULTURE OF POSSIBILITY
가능성의 문화는 도구가 무엇을 할 수 있는지부터 묻지 않습니다.
Do not worship the new.
Do not defend the old only because it is familiar.
Give unfinished ideas time.
Create responsible experiments.
Help people learn again.
Leave no one behind.
Share the gains of progress.
Protect human dignity.
그 도구가 있을 때 사람이 어떤 존재가 되고 싶은지 묻습니다.
WE SHAPE WHAT WE ADOPT